Is the fake Indian from the state of Massachusetts, or a state of confusion?

Sen. Elizabeth Warren is lucky the debates are more than, because she’s been exposed as terminally baffled by one subject to another —  either befuddled or totally ignorant.

For instance, within the Ch. 5 debate the other night, she was mentioned the recent ethics complaint which is filed against her for fundraising prior to a Top court confirmation vote on Brett Kavanaugh.

Even though the story have been all over the net, the fake Indian claimed that they knew nothing about any filings with the Senate Ethics Committee.

“Ah, ah actually, I do not know — ”

Oh, the complaint is filed, Lieawatha. You’re not likely to dangle another vote facing potential contributors. It’s an undesirable look. Pay to play, it’s sometimes called.

“I will —  I can scan through it on the other hand don’t know.”

This has been a recurring theme, considering it, totally to her first run with the Senate this year. She likes to called on something and responds with that vacant, deer-in-the-headlights look like she had for the debate in Needham. 

In a debate, GOP opponent Geoff Diehl asked her for the great recession of 2008-09 at Harvard, and how she refused to consider a pay cut of saving the jobs of lower-paid Harvard employees or perhaps to sign a petition in order to save jobs.

“We have no clue what he’s dealing with,” she said.

She likewise didn’t know what she was dealing with when she mentioned town of “Bern,” by which she apparently meant Bourne. But this year, she once mentioned her vacation to “free airline coast of Massachusetts.”

Confusion is her stock in trade. Resulting in a Native American cookbook, she confused a French haute cuisine recipe with the Ny Times —  cold crab omelet —  for the tribal recipe from her Indian ancestors, which when we now know she doesn’t possess any of.

On her 2014 income tax form, she got confused over how much of a deduction she must take for donating used clothes to charities. She drop $50,000 but that is an “entry error.” Confusing, no?

In 2012, she didn’t pay her automobile excise tax in Cambridge until I called her on there. She must have gotten confused about whether she still owed any cash to City Hall.

That same year, on MSNBC, a sycophantic interviewer asked her if she owned any stocks. No, she said, only mutual funds.

She used to brag which she supplied the “intellectual foundations” in the Occupy movement, however, when an interviewer asked her over it, she denied ever having stated it. The videotape was produced, along with the fake Indian was required to admit that, uh, yeah, maybe she had asserted that. Confusing, huh?

She went along to New Orleans and said the U.S. justice technique are “racist all-around,” however, when called about it, revealed that she hadn’t called anyone a racist. 

In Ohio, she told an audience of Democrats: “We’re in such a fight because there exists a criminal justice system that destroys lives and tears communities apart.”

Surely she directed at voice it out is “criminals,” as opposed to the “criminal justice system,” that are destroying lives and tearing communities apart. 

She’s appeared at one or more rally with Linda Sarsour, whom she wrongly identified as a mainstream activist.  During the past year, 100 Holocaust survivors signed a petition demanding that Sarsour ‘t be in a position to speak in the The big apple university owing to her strident activism against, among things, Israel.

Most significantly, the fake Indian seems puzzled by whether she’s running with the Senate, or president. Her opponent is Geoff Diehl, but it’s clear from the debates that he truly believes she is squaring off against Donald J. Trump.

As for your president, he has no confusion whatsoever about Elizabeth Warren. This is why he calls her Pocahontas.

 Order Howie’s book at the trial of Whitey Bulger, “Ratman,” at

Related Articles

Trump, Oprah lead surrogate campaigners in 2018 midterms