During the Kavanaugh confirmation hearings, some conservatives, including supposedly Trump-despising ones, declared themselves \”radicalized.\” \”Kavanaugh snapped something in me\” announced Sohrab Ahmari inside a since-deleted tweet. The Democrats had demonstrated their depravity, others said. Around the strength of this revelation, they ran into the arms of Donald Trump.
What is the logic of that response? If the Democrats and progressives resorted to irresponsible character assassination, trafficked in loose accusations, and failed to respect due process, how's the correct response to do exactly the same thing to them? Are they adopting a moral code saying: \”He is a liar and a cheat; therefore I must be one?\” If that is the standard, then we are consigned for an endless cycle of slander, with every side pointing to the other's previous outrage to warrant itself.
And let's not mince words, the left includes a large store of grievances, too. As Amanda Carpenter notes, the Republican party impeached Bill Clinton for perjury and all-around smuttiness, yet is wedded towards the serial sexual abuser within the Oval Office. It has even backed a credibly accused child molester for any Senate seat.
Enter Tara Reade, a former Biden staffer having a dubious story of abuse. The best is gorging on schadenfreude. \”MeToo Hypocrites Who've Gone Silent for Joe Biden\” sneered a New York Post columnist. Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy called Nancy Pelosi a hypocrite. \”You can't say one thing about every other time she's commented about any accusation and today say it is OK. She endorsed Joe Biden after knowing the Tara Reade situation.\” And the Wall Street Journal's Bill McGurn noted the discomfort of figures like Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and actress/MeToo heroine Alyssa Milano, who have stood by Biden only to take arrows using their company progressives.
Andrew Sullivan recalled that it was none other than Joe Biden who took the lead, during the Obama administration, in revising standards of proof in sexual assault cases on college campuses.
Biden is now claiming simply that he never did what Tara Reade said he did. Let's posit that he didn't. Too bad. If he were to attempt to defend himself, by their own campus logic, he would be barred any knowledge of what he was precisely accused of, even the identity of his accuser; he would be unable to see the results of any investigation; and the own claims of innocence could be rejected if the woman merely subjectively felt as if she were being abused, regardless of his own intent.
Despite the due process concerns, Biden continues to support those rules on campus sexual misconduct, because he made clear again on Wednesday.
But hold on, doesn't it matter if Biden is really innocent? Yes, he was part of an administration that tore down some crucial protections for the accused. Yes, Democrats entertained absurd allegations about Justice Kavanaugh. Yes, they condemned Bob Packwood while excusing Teddy Kennedy. Yes, Democrats filleted Clarence Thomas while giving Bill Clinton a pass . And yet, what have we become if we are indifferent to actual innocence in our rush to settle scores?
As a policymaker, Joe Biden needs to be held accountable for his poor judgment about standards of proof in sexual misbehavior cases. The correct answer is a different matter to say that he personally should face an incorrect accusation to achieve poetic justice.
Did conservatives not object, fairly, in the Kavanaugh case that a decades-old accusation is almost impossible to verify? Did they not protest that Kavanaugh's whole life, which contained not a hint of scandal, was evidence he was not a sexual predator?
Feminist Linda Hirshman has written that she plans to vote for Joe Biden though she \”believe[s] Tara Reade,\” just as she \”believed Anita Hill.\” She must not have looked closely at Reade's story, or, rather, stories. In 2021, Reade claimed that Biden had made her \”uncomfortable\” by touching her shoulders and neck 27 years ago. But in March of the year, Reade, a Bernie Sanders acolyte, suddenly changed her story to one of criminal sexual assault.
Her Twitter feed revealed a very suspicious motive. In response to Ryan Grim, who speculated that the match-up between Sanders and Biden would bring extra scrutiny to Biden, she tweeted \”Yup. Timing… watch for it….tic toc.\”
So many details of her account strain credulity. In her own telling, the sexual assault took place after she had already filed a sexual harassment claim. So we are expected to credit that Biden, knowing this, still elected to push her facing a wall and reach into her underwear-in a public place?
Biden has been rebuked for being too physically affectionate with females and men. But in his long career, he has never been accused of sexual misconduct of any kind. As with Kavanaugh, this is critical evidence. Predators don't pounce just once. Reade is a woman with a weird Putin fixation, a definite motive to damage Biden, and a story filled with holes. Conservatives were right to object that the \”believe women\” mantra, if taken as categorical, results in terrible miscarriages of justice. Of course some women lie. But when conservatives are sincere, they will see that Biden is the Kavanaugh here, and that injustice is injustice.